View plans

Solutions

Different teams. One product thread.

Use the same evidence-to-decision workflow whether you are learning to build, validating an idea or improving an existing product.

View example missionExplore paid pilots

01 · Solutions

Founders & startups: choose what to build.

Turn a broad idea into a bounded question and inspect the evidence before expanding scope.

  1. Input: audience, problem and constraints
  2. Mission: compare target segments or MVP options
  3. Output: decision brief and next experiment
From evidence to a judgement
From evidence to a judgementEvidence to Option A; Evidence to Option B; Option A to Challenge; Option B to Challenge; Challenge to Decide. Dissent stays in the record. High-impact decisions escalate to you.EvidenceResearch SynthesisOption AProduct recommendationOption BAlternative approachChallengeReviewers + veto rulesDecidePanel / your call
  1. EvidenceResearch SynthesisMission input
  2. Option AProduct recommendationFrom Evidence
  3. Option BAlternative approachFrom Evidence
  4. ChallengeReviewers + veto rulesFrom Option A + Option B
  5. DecidePanel / your callFrom Challenge
Dissent stays in the record. High-impact decisions escalate to you.

02 · Solutions

Product managers & teams: explain the trade-off.

Bring the product objective and available research into a mission your team can inspect.

  1. Input: a product problem and real evidence
  2. Mission: evaluate an onboarding improvement
  3. Output: alternatives, decision record and prototype brief
Specialists contribute. Reviewers challenge.
Specialists contribute. Reviewers challenge.Objective to Research; Objective to Product; Research to Challenge; Product to Challenge; Challenge to Your call. This is a sample team structure; enabled capabilities vary by mission.ObjectiveYouResearchEvidence briefProductOptions + trade-offsChallengeSecurity + EngineeringYour callHuman approval
  1. ObjectiveYouMission input
  2. ResearchEvidence briefFrom Objective
  3. ProductOptions + trade-offsFrom Objective
  4. ChallengeSecurity + EngineeringFrom Research + Product
  5. Your callHuman approvalFrom Challenge
This is a sample team structure; enabled capabilities vary by mission.

03 · Solutions

Students & builders: learn through the work.

Build a product while seeing how research, design and engineering judgements connect. Agent output supports learning; it does not replace your responsibility to inspect it.

  1. Input: a learning goal and product idea
  2. Mission: scope and prototype a useful workflow
  3. Output: reviewable artefacts and a reflection on decisions
From approved scope to reviewable output
From approved scope to reviewable outputPRD to UX; PRD to Architecture; UX to Prototype; Architecture to Prototype; Prototype to Inspect. A reviewable prototype is distinct from runtime-tested, deployed software.PRDProductUXDesignArchitectureEngineeringPrototypeBuild + QA reviewInspectYou + project export
  1. PRDProductMission input
  2. UXDesignFrom PRD
  3. ArchitectureEngineeringFrom PRD
  4. PrototypeBuild + QA reviewFrom UX + Architecture
  5. InspectYou + project exportFrom Prototype
A reviewable prototype is distinct from runtime-tested, deployed software.